S.G. v. Synchrony Bank
| S.G. |
| Synchrony Bank |
| 2:2024cv05788 |
| August 19, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Steven I Locke |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Electronic ORDER granting #14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew Soukup. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance to ensure electronic notification of activity in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 10/15/2024. (KDW)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 200, receipt number ANYEDC-18336034 by Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit A - DC Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit B - IL Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Proposed Order) (Soukup, Andrew) |
|
Electronic ORDER granting DE #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. On consent, the deadline for Defendant Synchrony Bank to answer or otherwise to the Complaint is extended to and including 10/28/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/10/2024. (JM)
|
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Synchrony Bank identifying Corporate Parent Synchrony Financial for Synchrony Bank. (Ruffino, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Lelia Alexandra Ledain on behalf of Synchrony Bank (aty to be noticed) (Ledain, Lelia) |
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint [Joint Motion for Extension of Defendant's Time to Answer, Move Against, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to October 28, 2024] by Synchrony Bank. (Ruffino, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Arthur Ruffino on behalf of Synchrony Bank (aty to be noticed) (Ruffino, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by S.G.. Synchrony Bank served on 8/21/2024, answer due 9/11/2024. (Merino, Javier) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna Menkova on behalf of S.G. (aty to be noticed) (Menkova, Anna) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Lewis Pollock on behalf of S.G. (aty to be noticed) (Pollock, Adam) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Synchrony Bank. (LJ) |
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by S.G. (Merino, Javier) Modified on 8/20/2024 (LJ). |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by S.G. (Merino, Javier) Modified on 8/20/2024 (LJ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Synchrony Bank filing fee $ 405, receipt number BNYEDC-18192557 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by S.G. (Merino, Javier) Modified on 8/20/2024 (LJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: S.G. v. Synchrony Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: S.G. | |
| Represented By: | Anna Menkova |
| Represented By: | Adam Lewis Pollock |
| Represented By: | Javier Luis Merino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Synchrony Bank | |
| Represented By: | Lelia Alexandra Ledain |
| Represented By: | Andrew Soukup |
| Represented By: | Andrew Arthur Ruffino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
