Charles v. United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff: Casey-Ann Charles
Defendant: United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv06040
Filed: August 28, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lee G Dunst
Referring Judge: Diane Gujarati
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2024 Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Hearing re #1 Notice of Removal, request that Court issue an Order to Show Cause by Casey-Ann Charles. (Barshay, David)
August 29, 2024 Filing 5 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (LJ)
August 29, 2024 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2024: #1 Additional Corrections) (LJ).
August 29, 2024 Case Assigned to Judge Diane Gujarati and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ)
August 28, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Marie Imbornone on behalf of United Collection Bureau, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Imbornone, Stephanie)
August 28, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Collection Bureau, Inc. (Siachos, Peter)
August 28, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Collection Bureau, Inc. from District Court of the County of Nassau, case number CV-009684-24/NA. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-18224016) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Certificate of Service) (Siachos, Peter) Modified on 8/29/2024 (LJ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles v. United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Collection Bureau, Inc.
Represented By: Peter G. Siachos
Represented By: Stephanie Marie Imbornone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Casey-Ann Charles
Represented By: David M. Barshay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?