Bravo v. Grover et al
| Carmin Bravo |
| Sandeep Grover, Gourav Arora and Anamika Grover |
| 2:2024cv07237 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nusrat Jahan Choudhury |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached, the Court denies pro se Plaintiff Carmin Bravo's ("Bravo") application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") without prejudice and with leave to renew upon filing the enclosed "Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)."The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Bravo at the address of record and to record such mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 11/21/2024. (DJL)
|
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Gourav Arora, Anamika Grover, Sandeep Grover. (AMF) |
| Filing 11 FILING FEE: $ 405.00, receipt number 100017869 (AMF) |
| Filing 9 Pro Se Office Letter to Pro Se Litigant Acknowledging Receipt of Civil Action. (HM) |
| Filing 8 Pro Se Office Letter Re: Deficient Magistrate Consent Form (Attachments: #1 Deficient Magistrate Consent Form) (HM) |
| Filing 7 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (DC) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:24-cv-07456. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York.(tg) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: Carmin Bravo 830 Amsterdam Avenue Apt #3 New York, NY 10025. (ak) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
|
Filing 5
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees and whether Plaintiff should be granted pro bono counsel are determinations to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this court. This order closes this case in this court. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/4/2024) (tg) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.]
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Carmin Bravo 830 Amsterdam Avenue Apt #3 New York, NY 10025. (tro) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may #consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for #permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (gp) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.]
|
| CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see #Rule 9.2 of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information..(gp) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
| MOTION to Appoint Counsel see document #4 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel by Carmin Bravo. (DC) |
| MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis see document #2 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Carmin Bravo. (DC) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel. Document filed by Carmin Bravo..(gp) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Carmin Bravo..(gp) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gourav Arora, Anamika Grover, Sandeep Grover. Document filed by Carmin Bravo..(gp) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/15/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
