Snou v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
Kowame Paul Arnold Snou |
Mathew C. Varghese, Alejandro Mayorkas, Jennifer Higgins, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Ur M. Jaddou, New York Asylum Office, USCIS, Matthew D. Emrich and Ted H. Kim |
2:2024cv08099 |
November 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Action in Mandamus against Matthew D. Emrich, Jennifer Higgins, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, New York Asylum Office, USCIS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Mathew C. Varghese filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18518242 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Kowame Paul Arnold Snou. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A - USCIS Acknowledgement Receipt, #4 Exhibit B - Asylum Scheduling Website, #5 Exhibit C - Letter from Mathew C. Varghese, #6 Exhibit D - Affirmation of Kowame Paul Arnold Senou, #7 Exhibit E - Monthly Statistics Report, #8 Exhibit F - Asylum Workload January 2018, #9 Exhibit G - Final Report, #10 Exhibit H - AILA Practice Pointer) (Lorenzo, Marisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.