Rodriguez v. Kuhlman

Rodriguez v. Kuhlman

Petitioner:	Anthony Rodriguez
Respondent:	Robert Kuhlman
Case Number:	1:1998cv00063
Filed:	January 7, 1998
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Sullivan
Presiding Judge:	James C. Francis
Presiding Judge:	Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2013	Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 18 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Anthony Rodriguez, 27 Report and Recommendations. On July 10, 2013, Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV issued a Report and Recommendation [dkt. no. 27] (the &qu ot;Report") with respect to pro se petitioner Anthony Rodriguez's motion pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking an order vacating a final judgment that dismissed as untimely his petition for a writ of habe as corpus [dkt. no. 18]. Having reviewed Petitioner's objections and finding Judge Francis's decision to be correct and appropriate upon de novo review, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Report is hereby ADOPTED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/6/2013) (djc) Modified on 9/6/2013 (djc).

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2013

Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 18 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Anthony Rodriguez, 27 Report and Recommendations. On July 10, 2013, Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV issued a Report and Recommendation [dkt. no. 27] (the &qu ot;Report") with respect to pro se petitioner Anthony Rodriguez's motion pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking an order vacating a final judgment that dismissed as untimely his petition for a writ of habe as corpus [dkt. no. 18]. Having reviewed Petitioner's objections and finding Judge Francis's decision to be correct and appropriate upon de novo review, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Report is hereby ADOPTED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/6/2013) (djc) Modified on 9/6/2013 (djc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Kuhlman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Rodriguez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Kuhlman
Represented By:	Cynthia Ann Carlson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?