Cordius Trust v. Kummerfeld Assoc., et al
| 1:1999cv03200 |
| May 4, 1999 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Ronald L. Ellis |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity: Promissory Note |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, #98476 that Mr. Kummerfeld's January 15, 2010 motion for a stay of the January 13, 2010 Order pending appeal is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 1/21/10) (pl) Modified on 1/25/2010 (ajc).
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Ms. Kummerfeld's request for an adjournment of the November 4 hearing concerning the Brinitzer mortgage is denied. The hearing shall occur on November 4 as previously ordered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Kum merfeld shall execute and return to counsel for Cordius Trust the quit-claim deed and withdrawal of Declaration of Homestead by November 3. If she fails to do so she must appear at the November 4 hearing to show cause why she should not be incarcerat ed until she executes said documents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party wishing to submit a brief concerning whether the Brinitzer mortgage constitutes a fraudulent conveyance shall do so by November 2. If a party files a brief the party shall de liver two courtesy copies to Chambers by delivering them to the United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York New York no later than 5:00pm on November 2. The Court shall consider the request for post hearing briefing on the fraudulent conveyance issue at the November 4 hearing. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/29/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jpo)
|
|
Filing
212
OPINION & ORDER:# 98188 For the reasons set forth in this Opinion & order, Cordius' July 18, 2008 motion is granted. Mr. Kummerfeld is held in contempt for violating the May 6, 2008 Discovery Order. Mr. Kummerfeld, Ms. Kummerfeld, and KAI are h eld in contempt for violating the restraining notices. The relief requested by Cordius is granted in part and denied in part. Additional orders to effectuate the relief granted shall follow. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/23/09) (tro) Modified on 10/30/2009 (eef).
|
|
Filing
205
OPINION AND ORDER:#97843 For reasons further set forth in said Order, I find the Kummerfelds in contempt and subject to the aforementioned sanctions. 188 MOTION For Contempt filed by Cordius Trust. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 8/5/09) (db) Modified on 8/6/2009 (eef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cordius Trust v. Kummerfeld Assoc., et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
