Astra Aktiebolag, et al v. Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al
| Astra Aktiebolag, Aktiebolaget Hassle, Astra Merck Enterprises Inc. and Astra Merck Inc. |
| Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kremers Urban Development Co., Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and Genpharm, Inc. |
| Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| Astra Aktiebolag, Aktiebolaget Hassle, Astra Merck Enterprises Inc. and Astra Merck Inc. |
| 1:1999cv08926 |
| April 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Barbara S. Jones |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
OPINION AND ORDER: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53(b) (3), the Court directs Mr. Peterson to submit to the Court an affidavit disclosing whether there is any ground for his disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455. The Court will forward that affidavit to the Parties immediately upon receipt. The Parties will then have seven (7) calendar days to advise the Court of any conflicts. Assuming there are none, shortly thereafter the Court expects to issue an order appointing Mr. Peterson as Special Master. (Signed by Judge Barbara S. Jones on 6/8/2010) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER: Therefore, Andrx's motion to reargue or for reconsideration of the Court's February 2, 2010 decision is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Barbara S. Jones on 4/5/2010) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
