Hoffenberg v. United States
| 1:2000cv01686 |
| March 6, 2000 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
OPINION: Hoffenberg's application does not state what issues he intends to raise on appeal. Regardless, this Court has had several opportunities to consider Hoffenberg's claims and has repeatedly found that they lack merit. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (1) (3), Hoffenberg's appeal cannot be taken in good faith and his application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/17/2010) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION: For the reasons set forth above, Hoffenberg's motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is denied, and his motion for bail is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 4/26/2010) (jfe)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER: Petitioner's motions dated February 19, 2010 will be heard on submission, without oral argument, on Wednesday, April 14, 2010. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 4/1/2010) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hoffenberg v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
