Northeast Utilities v. Consolidated Edison
| Northeast Utilities |
| Consolidated Edison, Inc. |
| 1:2001cv02052 |
| March 12, 2001 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John G Koeltl |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2001. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STIPULATION AND ORDER of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41Ia) of the F.R.C.P. ( signed by Judge John G. Koeltl ) (pl)
|
| Case closed. (pl) |
|
STIPULATION AND ORDER; Con Edison shall file and serve an amended complaint within one week after this Stipulation is approved by the Court and notice of approval is received by the parties. NU agrees to assert the claims made in the NU Complaint as a counterclaim in the Con Edison Action. Accordingly, within one week after service of the Amended Complaint, NU shall file and serve a counterclaim and answer in response to the Amended Complaint, which may be contained in separate documents, and NU and Con Edison shall promptly thereafter submit to the Court a stipulation of voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, of the NU Action. Con Edison shall file and serve its reply to NU's counterclaim within one week after NU serves its counterclaim and answer. Should Con Edison elect to include in its Amended Complaint information that NU considers confidential, Con Edison shall file the Amended Complaint under seal and file a redacted version of the Amended Complaint in the public record. The filing of the Amended Complaint under seal together with a redacted version thereof in the public record shall be without prejudice to either party's right to oppose or support any application by any non-party to cause the Amended Complaint to be unsealed; provided, however, that neither the filing of the Amended Complaint nor execution of this stipulation shall be deemed to be a waiver of or limitation on NU's right to assert any and all claims that it may have against Con Edison arising out of the inclusion in the Amended Complaint of information that NU considers confidential. ( signed by Judge John G. Koeltl ). (orig. doc. dktd. in 01 Civ. 1893, doc. #5). (sac) Modified on 05/21/2001
|
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of John Gueli by Consolidated Edison in support Re: [6-1] motion for an order dismissing, [6-2] motion staying action. (docmt received in night dep. on 04/16/01 at 5:25 p.m.) (djc) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, to Complaint by Consolidated Edison (Attorney Stuart J. Baskin from the Firm: Shearman & Sterling) . (djc) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Consolidated Edison in support of [6-1] motion for an order dismissing, [6-2] motion staying action; (docmt received in night dep. on 04/16/01 at 5:24 p.m.) (djc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION (filed on service date) by Consolidated Edison for an order dismissing or staying action . Return date not indicated. (djc) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Assignment as to Consolidated Edison by personal service on Shearman & Sterling, attorneys for defendant, on 3/16/01. (kkc) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge John G. Koeltl. Copy of notice and judge's rules mailed to Attorney(s) of record: Jeffrey M. Rosin, Joseph N. Sacca, Seth M. Schwartz, Douglas M. Kraus. (tp) |
| Case accepted as related to 01-cv-1893. Notice of assignment to follow. (tp) |
| Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. (tp) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint as to Consolidated Edison by Rosa Umryayeva, legal secretary on 3/12/01. Answer due on 4/2/01 for Consolidated Edison. (bm) |
| Filing 2 RULE 1.9 CERTIFICATE filed by Northeast Utilities. (db) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed. Summons issued and Notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 399552. (db) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge John G. Koeltl as possibly related 1:01cv1893. (db) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Northeast Utilities v. Consolidated Edison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Northeast Utilities | |
| Represented By: | Joseph N. Sacca |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Kraus |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Rosin |
| Represented By: | Seth M Schwartz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Consolidated Edison, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stuart Jay Baskin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
