Bookman v. Merrill Lynch

Bookman v. Merrill Lynch

Case Number:	1:2002cv01108
Filed:	February 11, 2002
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge:	James C. Francis
Presiding Judge:	Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 16, 2009	Filing 101 ORDER, that by 6/26/09, the parties shall submit a joint status letter regarding; (1) the parties' progress toward the resolution of this matter, and (2) the parties availability for trial in August and September 2009. Upon receipt of the partie s' letter, and if this matter is not resolved beforehand, the Court will set a deadline for the submission of a joint pretrial order pursuant to Rule 3.A of my Individual Practices and schedule a pretrial conference that will be conducted in mid-July. ( Status Report due by 6/26/2009.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 6/16/09) (cd)
May 14, 2009	Filing 100 OPINION AND ORDER:# 97516 For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The following claims are hereby dismissed; (1) all of Plaintiff's claims under the ADA; (2) Plaintiff 9;s claims under Title VII and the ADEA for failure to promote and retaliation; and (3) Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim under the ADEA. Plaintiff is also deemed to have abandon any claims relating to his PDP training schedule and the circumstances surrounding his passage of the Series 7 exam. Se supra note 5. Remaining to be resolved in this litigation are: (1) Plaintiff's discriminatory termination claims under Title VII and the ADEA, and (2) Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim under Title VII. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 5/14/09) (tro) Modified on 5/18/2009 (jab).

Date Filed

Document Text

June 16, 2009

Filing 101 ORDER, that by 6/26/09, the parties shall submit a joint status letter regarding; (1) the parties' progress toward the resolution of this matter, and (2) the parties availability for trial in August and September 2009. Upon receipt of the partie s' letter, and if this matter is not resolved beforehand, the Court will set a deadline for the submission of a joint pretrial order pursuant to Rule 3.A of my Individual Practices and schedule a pretrial conference that will be conducted in mid-July. ( Status Report due by 6/26/2009.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 6/16/09) (cd)

May 14, 2009

Filing 100 OPINION AND ORDER:# 97516 For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The following claims are hereby dismissed; (1) all of Plaintiff's claims under the ADA; (2) Plaintiff 9;s claims under Title VII and the ADEA for failure to promote and retaliation; and (3) Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim under the ADEA. Plaintiff is also deemed to have abandon any claims relating to his PDP training schedule and the circumstances surrounding his passage of the Series 7 exam. Se supra note 5. Remaining to be resolved in this litigation are: (1) Plaintiff's discriminatory termination claims under Title VII and the ADEA, and (2) Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim under Title VII. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 5/14/09) (tro) Modified on 5/18/2009 (jab).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bookman v. Merrill Lynch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?