Sanofi-Synthelabo, et al v. Apotex Inc., et al
| Sanofi-Synthelabo, Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership and Sanofi-Aventis |
| Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. |
| Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. |
| Sanofi-Synthelabo, Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership |
| National Association of Chain Drug Stores |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Andrew G. Bodnar |
| 1:2002cv02255 |
| March 21, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Sidney H. Stein |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 486
OPINION AND ORDER or the reasons set forth above, Sanofi's motion for summary judgment on its claim for $442,209,362 in damages is granted. Sanofi is also entitled to prejudgment interest on that award at the average annual prime rate, compounded quarterly, from August 19,2006 until the present-as well as costs and post-judgment interest as set by statute. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 10/19/2010) (jmi)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
