Sixteen, Inc. v. Brown
| Michel Quiniou, Agatha Diffusion, S.R.L. and Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C. |
| Agatha Brown |
| Sixteen, Inc. |
| 1:2002cv04630 |
| June 17, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Deborah A. Batts |
| Debra C. Freeman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The documents docketed at number 119 are hereby UNSEALED, and shall be maintained as open records unless and until Plaintiff brings to the Court's attention specific documents with specific page numbers that are confidentia l and a rationale for sealing those specific documents or pages. And, for the reasons stated above, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is HEREBY directed to terminate all pending motions. In this Court's August 20, 2007 Order, Plaintiff was given notice of a schedule to submit letters regarding proposed motions. Plaintiff has not made any motion for summary judgment. Therefore, Plaintiff has waived the opportunity to move for summary judgment on the Counterclaims against her. The Parties are to appear at a status conference on the counterclaims and attorney fee issues on June 19, 2009 at 11:30AM. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 4/28/2009) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
