Rivas v. I.N.S.
Petitioner: Rudi Rivas
Respondent: Immigration and Naturalization Service
Case Number: 1:2002cv06778
Filed: August 26, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Tompkins
Presiding Judge: Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: It is hereby ordered that plaintiff's February 4 and April 7 motions for reconsideration and for a stay of removal are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/16/2010) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jpo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rivas v. I.N.S.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rudi Rivas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Immigration and Naturalization Service
Represented By: Megan Lynn Brackney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?