Spinelli, et al v. The City of New York, et al
| Angela Spinelli and Olinville Arms, Inc. |
| The City of New York and Pasquale Carabella |
| 1:2002cv08967 |
| February 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Frank Maas |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION: Plaintiffs submitted their letter motion on July 27, 2011, and the motion was considered filly submitted on August 17, 2011. Plaintiffs have not established any basis for an exemption from Rule 59(e); therefore, Plaintiff's motion is denied as untimely. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/25/2011) (rdz) Modified on 8/30/2011 (rdz).
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION: For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, Plaintiffs' motion for a new trial is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 7/11/2011) (tro)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION. Plaintiffs, in a letter dated November 5, 2010, ask the Court to reconsider its finding that Olinville, not Spinelli, was the licensee for the firearm dealer's license. Plaintiffs cite Title 38 of the of the Rule of the City of New Yor k § 1-02, which provides that a principal agent "refers to the person who is in active charge of the dealership" and that "Dealer's licenses are issued to individuals." The licenses at issue plainly state that Olinville Arms, Inc. was the licensee. Spinelli was listed on one license as Olinville's sole officer, which may be construed as listing Spinelli as the principal agent. This fact leans toward allowing Plaintiff to present her claim for emotional damages. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 11/8/10) (djc)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION that through the two letters dated 10/22/10, the Parties have filed several motions in limine. These motions were fully submitted on 10/27/10. They are resolved as further set forth in this document. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 11/1/10) (cd)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION for the following reasons, the Court has determined that the post-deprivation hearing should have been given within 30 days of the NYPD's seizure of Plaintiffs' license. Therefore, Plaintiff's damages begin to accumulate from 11/9/01 onward. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 10/26/10) (cd)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER, 2/10/10 Pretrial Conference reset for 3/24/2010 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 18C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Robert W. Sweet. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 2/8/10) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
