Tyco International, et al v. Swartz
1:2003cv02247 |
April 1, 2003 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
Thomas P. Griesa |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1391 Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 OPINION: This is an action brought by Tyco against its former Chief Financial Officer Mark Swartz. Swartz and his then-co-defendant Dennis Kozlowski, the former Tyco CEO, were convicted in New York state court on numerous criminal charges in connecti on with a scheme by the two of them to enrich themselves by abusing various Tyco compensation programs. This civil action is to recover the portion of Tyco's damages stemming from that scheme that are attributable to Swartz...Accordingly, Tyco is entitled to $19,910,070 in interest on its conversion claim. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/19/2013) (mt) |
Filing 35 OPINION: #99988 Tyco's partial motion for summary judgment on liability is granted as to the first, second, third and eighth causes of action, and denied as to the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh causes of action. This resolves the motion listed as document 20 in this case. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/3/2011) (js) Modified on 3/4/2011 (ajc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tyco International, et al v. Swartz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.