EK Success, Ltd. v. Glitterwrap, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: EK Success, Ltd.
Defendant: Melinda Scott, Glitterwrap, Inc., Alfred Scott, Melinda Scott Katzman and John Does 1-100
Case Number: 1:2003cv06062
Filed: August 12, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: John E Sprizzo
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER; counsel to all parties having represented to the Court that this action has been settled, the action is discontinued without prejudice to either party to apply on 5 days' notice for its restoration to the trial calendar of this Court, if said settlement is not consummated. The parties shall file a stipulation of discontinuance and shall exchange releases within 45 days of the date hereof. If the stipulation of discontinuance is not filed and/or the parties do not apply to restore the action to the trial calendar of this Court within said 45 day period, this Order of Discontinuance shall be deemed a dismissal of all claims, counterclaims, and cross claims with prejudice, and without costs to either party. (Signed by Judge John E. Sprizzo on 1/20/04) (sn, )
January 14, 2004 Filing 12 ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF JUDGMENT; that defendantsGlitterwrap, Inc., Alfred Scott and Melinda Scott, have submitted an offer of Judgment pursuant to Rule 68 of the FRCP dated 12/4/03. Plaintiff EK Success, Ltd., by and through its attorneys, Sofer & Haroun, L.L.P., hereby accepts defendants' Offer of Judgment. Document filed by EK Success, Ltd. (tp, )
December 5, 2003 Filing 11 AMENDED ANSWER to 6 Counterclaim. Document filed by EK Success, Ltd.. (tr, )
November 26, 2003 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER; Pretrial Conference set for 1/12/2004 at 03:00 PM before Judge John E. Sprizzo, in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street. (Signed by Judge John E. Sprizzo on 11/25/03) (sac, )
November 3, 2003 Filing 9 ANSWER by EK Success, Ltd. to [6-1] counterclaim; Firm of: Sofer & Haroun, LLP by attorney Robert M. Haroun for counter-defendant EK Success, Ltd. (sb)
September 30, 2003 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Glitterwrap, Inc., Alfred Scott, Melinda Scott (Attorney Oren J. Warshavsky from the Firm: Gibbons Del Deo et al) . (cd)
September 30, 2003 Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATE filed by Glitterwrap, Inc. . (cd)
September 23, 2003 Filing 5 STIPULATION: reset answer due for 9/22/03 for Glitterwrap, Inc., for Alfred Scott, for Melinda Scott. ( signed by Judge John E. Sprizzo ) (sac)
September 22, 2003 Filing 6 COUNTERCLAIM by Glitterwrap, Inc. against EK Success, Ltd. (cd)
August 27, 2003 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of S&C as to Alfred Scott by Mr. Tom Orefice, Co-Worker on 8/20/03; also served by registered first class mail on 8/22/03. Answer due on 9/9/03 for Alfred Scott . (ae)
August 27, 2003 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of S&C as to Melinda Scott by Mr. Tom Orefice, Co-worker on 8/20/03; and also served by Registered first class mail on 8/22/3. Answer due on 9/9/03 for Melinda Scott . (ae) Modified on 09/02/2003
August 13, 2003 Mailed notice to Register of Copyrights to report the filing of this action. (jjm)
August 12, 2003 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATE filed by EK Success, Ltd. . (jjm)
August 12, 2003 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed. Summons issued and Notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 481771. (jjm)
August 12, 2003 Magistrate Judge Frank Maas is so designated. (jjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EK Success, Ltd. v. Glitterwrap, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melinda Scott
Represented By: Oren J. Warshavsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glitterwrap, Inc.
Represented By: Oren J. Warshavsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alfred Scott
Represented By: Oren J. Warshavsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melinda Scott Katzman
Represented By: Oren J. Warshavsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EK Success, Ltd.
Represented By: Robert M. Haroun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?