Peters, et al v. UAL Corporation, et al
| Lauren E. Peters |
| UAL Corporation, United Airlines, Inc., Huntleigh USA Corporation, ICTS International NV, Globe Aviation Services, Burns International Security Services Corporation, Securitas AB, Massachusetts Port Authority, The Boeing Company, Midwest Express Airlines, Inc., Continental Airlines, Inc., Does and MidWest Airlines, Inc. |
| 1:2003cv06940 |
| March 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Alvin K. Hellerstein |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE AND DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. For the reasons stated in this order, I deny Mr. Leichty's application for admission pro hac vice and Mr. Ransmeier's motion for Rule 11 sanctions. The C lerk shall mark the motions (Doc. Nos. 55 and 58) as terminated. denying (1075) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 1:21-mc-00101-AKH; denying (55) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; denying (58) Motion of John C. Ransmeier, Administrator of the Estate of Lousi Neil Mariani, For an Injunction pursuant to FRCP Rule 11 in case 1:03-cv-06940-AKH. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 3/1/10) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-mc-00101-AKH, 1:03-cv-06940-AKH(rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
