Gore v. The RBA Group
| Charles E. Gore |
| The RBA Group and Haider Engineering |
| 1:2003cv09442 |
| October 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| James C. Francis |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion as Doc. No. 75, as Plaintiff has withdrawn its claims against Defendant Haider Engineering, and Haider Engineering seeks summary judgment against Defendant RBA Group's cross-claims in a separate motion. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 10/1/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons stated on the record at the March 27, 2009 oral argument, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Francis's March 10, 2009 Report and Recommendation and denies Defendant Haider Engineering 9;s motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process. Plaintiffis directed to serve Defendant Haider Engineering and file proof of service electronically with the Court within thirty days of the date of this Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Francis to address any additional discovery Defendant Haider Engineering may request or any discovery disputes that may arise. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status letter to the Court no later than forty-five days from the date of this Order. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion docketed as Document No. 58. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/27/09) (js)
|
|
Filing
63
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 58 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Haider Engineering. For the reasons set forth above, I recommend that Haider Engineerings motion to dismiss be denied and that the plaintiffs time to effect service on Haider Engineering b e extended under Rule 4(m) until thirty (30) days from the date of the issuance of the Court's decision. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have ten (10) days from this date to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 3/27/2009 (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 3/10/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
