In re McRay, Richardson, Santana, Wise and Salaam Litigation
| Antron McCray, Linda McCray, Kevin Richardson, Grace Cuffee, Connie Richardson, Valerie Cuffee, Crystal Cuffee, Angela Cuffee, Raymond Santana, Jr., Raymond Santana, Sr. and Joann Santana |
| The City of New York, New York City Police Department, New York County District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, City Police commissioner raymond Kelly, Former New york City Police Commissioner Benjamin Ward, Former New York City Police Department Chief of Detectives Colangelo, Former New York City Police department Manhattan Chief of Detectives Rosenthal, Former New York City Police Department Chief of Patrol Borough Manhattan North Selvaggi, New York City Police Detectives Ramon Rosario, Carlos Gonzalez, Harry Hildebrandt, Michael Sheehan, John Hartigan, Thomas McKenna, Humberto Arroyo, Scott Jaffer, John O'Sullivan, John Taglioni, B and New York City Police Supervisory Detectives Deputy Inspector Powell |
| Kharey Wise, Doloris Wise, Daniel Wise, Michael Wise, Victor Wise, Norman Wise, Yusef Salaam, Sharonne Salaam, Aisha Salaam and Shareef Salaam |
| Bill Kelly, Robert Nugent, Bruno Francisci, Thomas McCabe, Joseph Finston, Jack Doyle, John Does, Mary Roes, Linda Fairstein, Elizabeth Lederer, Tim Clements, Jane Does, Richard Roes and Rachel Roes |
| 1:2003cv09685 |
| December 8, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Deborah A. Batts |
| Ronald L. Ellis |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
369
OPINION & ORDER #105530 re: 356 LETTER MOTION to Reopen Case on ORDER & OPINION dated March 31, 2015 addressed to Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis from Gareth W. Stewart, as counsel to petitioner SH&W dated April 2, 2015, filed by Lenno x Stephen Hinds. For the reasons that follow, SHW's Rule 60 Motion and request for interest is DENIED. Furthermore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Day Pitney LLP disburse the funds from the escrow account in accordance with the Court's March 31 Order: $237,977.50 to SHW and the remaining amount to FBK. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 5/21/2015) (kko) Modified on 5/21/2015 (soh).
|
|
Filing
355
ORDER & OPINION re: 314 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Lennox Stephen Hinds. For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS SHW's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs in the amount of $237,997.50. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 3/31/2015) (kko)
|
|
Filing
245
ORDER: Having conducted the appropriate level of review, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Judge Ronald L. Ellis, dated March 5, 2013, is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court as modified herein. Florentine's Motion to quash Defendant's subpoena is GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 9/23/2013) (rsh)
|
|
Filing
220
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER: Based on the foregoing, Florentine's motion to quash Defendants' amended subpoena is GRANTED because: (1) Florentine has established entitlement to the reporter's privilege; and (2) Defendants have failed to overcome the reporter's privilege by making a showing that the information they seek pertains to a significant issue and is unavailable from alternative sources. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 3/05/2013) (ama)
|
|
Filing
215
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 186 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Served By Defendants Upon Non-Party Florentine Films. filed by Florentine Films. Based on the foregoing, Florentine's motion to quash Defendants' amended subpoena is GRANTED beca use: (1) Florentine has established entitlement to the reporter's privilege; and (2) Defendants have failed to overcome the reporter's privilege by making a showing that the information they seek pertains to a significant issue and is unavailable from alternative sources.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 2/19/2013) (ama)
|
|
Filing
178
ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation, Docket Entry No. 175, of United States Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis, dated March 28, 2012, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety; and 2. Plaintiff Deloris Wise's action is hereby DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 5/29/2012) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
176
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 160 MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's November 22, 2011 Opinion and Order filed by Linda Fairstein, Tim Clements, Former New York City Police department Manhattan Chief of Detectives Rosenthal, New Yor k City Police Department, The City of New York, Thomas McCabe, City Police commissioner raymond Kelly, Bill Kelly, Former New York City Police Department Chief of Patrol Borough Manhattan North Selvaggi, Robert Nugent, New York City Police Detectives Ramon Rosario, Carlos Gonzalez, Harry Hildebrandt, Michael Sheehan, John Hartigan, Thomas McKenna, Humberto Arroyo, Scott Jaffer, John O'Sullivan, John Taglioni, B, Elizabeth Lederer, Bruno Francisci. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 4/26/2012) (mro)
|
|
Filing
153
OPINION AND ORDER re: 134 FIRST MOTION to Compel Defendants to produce documents in unredacted form filed by Daniel Wise, Sharonne Salaam, Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Michael Wise, Raymond Santana, Jr., Valerie Cuffee, Linda McCray, Shareef Sa laam, Aisha Salaam, Raymond Santana, Sr., Norman Wise, Crystal Cuffee, Connie Richardson, Doloris Wise, Grace Cuffee, Yusef Salaam, Victor Wise, Angela Cuffee, Kharey Wise, Joann Santana. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion to compel is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, part. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 11/22/2011) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
126
OPINION AND ORDER, Defendants' motion for reconsideration is DENIED because the Second Circuit's decision in Adamowicz did not represent a change in controlling law and the information sought by Plaintiffs is relevant to their claims. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 2/15/11) (pl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
