Williams et al v. Shakin' Baker Music, Inc.
| Ellis Williams, John B. Miller and Robert Durrell Allen |
| Shakin' Baker Music, Inc. |
| 1:2003cv10272 |
| December 30, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gerard E Lynch |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Plaintiffs in this action filed their complaint on 12/30/2003. To date, the Clerk of Court has received no proof that the defendant has been served witih the summons and complaint. On 6/1/2004, the Court ordered that the plaintiffs effect service by 7/1/2004, or this case would be dismissed. As of this date the Clerk's office has received no proof of service. It is hereby ordered that this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the F.R.C.P. without prejudice. (Signed by Judge Gerard E. Lynch on 7/19/2004) (jsa, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER that plaintiffs serve dft with the summons and complaint by 7/1/04; if such service is not made, the court will dismiss the case. (Signed by Judge Gerard E. Lynch on 6/1/04) (dle, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shakin' Baker Music, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 150.00, Receipt Number 495276)Document filed by Robert Durrell Allen, John B. Miller, Ellis Williams.(dle, ) |
| Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis is so designated. (dle, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
