In Re: Parmalat Securities Litigation
| Southern Alaska Carpenters Pension Fund, Cristina Poncibo and Margery Louise Kronengold |
| Bonlat Financing Corporation, Calisto Tanzi, Fausto Tonna, Coloniale S.p.A., Citigroup, Inc., Buconero, LLC, Zinni & Associates, P.C., Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Deloitte & Touche S.p.A., Grant Thornton International, Grant Thornton S.p.A., Deutsche Bank AG, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Bank of America Corporation, James E. Copeland, Jr, Grant Thornton LLP, Citibank, N.A., Eureka Securitisation plc, Vialattea LLC, Banc of America Securities Limited, Bank of America N.A. USA, Deloitte & Touche LLP, Pavia E. Ansaldo, Parmalat S.p.A. and Enrico Bondi |
| Ezio Argano and Enrico Bondi |
| Parmalat S.p.A. and Enrico Bondi |
| Grant Thornton International and Grant Thornton LLP |
| 1:2004cv00030 |
| January 5, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Henry B. Pitman |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1070
OPINION AND ORDER:#97604 that Lead Plaintiffs' motion is granted. Defendants' designations of confidentiality are stricken with respect to all documents listed on the schedules annexed hereto. The Citi defendants' designations of conf identiality are also stricken with respect to all documents produced by them and submitted by the parties in connection with the parties' summary judgment motions. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/1/09) Copies sent by chambers.(dle) Modified on 6/8/2009 (jab).
|
|
Filing
1056
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Corrected)... In all the circumstances, the motion to certify questions to the Court of Appeals [04MD 1653 docket item 1670, 04 Civ. 0030 docket item 1041] is denied... and as further set forth. (initial Memorandum Opinion Doc. No. 1683). (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/2/09) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:04-md-01653-LAK-HBP, 1:04-cv-00030-LAK-HBP(rjm)
|
|
Filing
1052
MEMORANDUM OPINION #97134 re: (983 in 1:04-cv-00030-LAK-HBP, 1585 in 1:04-md-01653-LAK-HBP) MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Grant Thornton LLP, Grant Thornton International. For the foregoing reasons, defendants motion for summary judgment dism issing the complaints [04 Civ. 0030 docket item 983; 04 MD 1653 docket item 1585; 04 Civ. 9771 docket item 613; 06 Civ. 2991 docket item 183] is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/25/2009) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:04-md-01653-LAK-HBP, 1:04-cv-00030-LAK-HBP, 1:04-cv-09771-LAK, 1:06-cv-02991-LAK(jmi) Modified on 2/27/2009 (mro).
|
|
Filing
1051
MEMORANDUM OPINION #97119: In light of all the evidence, considered together, a reasonable jury could conclude that it is more likely than not that DT-US controlled DTT. DT-USs motion for reconsideration[04MD1653 docket item 1672, 04 Civ. 0030 docket item 1043] is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/23/2009) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:04-md-01653-LAK-HBP, 1:04-cv-00030-LAK-HBP(jmi) Modified on 2/25/2009 (mro).
|
|
Filing
1040
MEMORANDUM OPINION # 97011. For the foregoing reasons, the Deloitte defendants motion for summary judgment [04 Civ. 0030 docket item 984; 04 MD 1653 docket item 1586] is denied, and as further set forth. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 1/27/09) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:04-md-01653-LAK-HBP, 1:04-cv-00030-LAK-HBP(rjm) Modified on 2/2/2009 (rjm).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
