Andrews v. Cruz et al
1:2004cv00566 |
January 23, 2004 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Paul A. Crotty |
Ronald L. Ellis |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: #98730 CONCLUSION: For the foregoing reasons, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation as its opinion. The Defendants' motions for summary judgment are DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close the motions at docket numbers 65, 66 and 67. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on March 24, 2010) (mov) Modified on 3/26/2010 (ajc). |
Filing 63 ORDER: Status Conference set for 4/23/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis. It is further ordered that submission of the Joint Final Pretrial Order is STAYED, pending resolution of Defendants' application to file a motion for Summary Judgment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 4/16/2009) (jpo) |
Filing 62 ORDER that the parties file their Joint Pretrial Order, in accordance with the Honorable Paul A. Crotty's individual practice rules, on or before 4/30/09. ( Pretrial Order due by 4/30/2009.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 4/1/09) (cd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Andrews v. Cruz et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.