Papyrus Technology Corporation v. New York Stock Exchange LLC
Case Number: 1:2004cv00625
Filed: January 27, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Dolinger
Presiding Judge: Sidney H. Stein
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 171 OPINION AND ORDER (PUBLIC Version): Having considered the parties motions and their copious submissions, and for the reasons contained herein, it is hereby: ORDERED that NYSE's motion for summary judgment that all asserted claims of the 877 Pate nt are invalid is GRANTED; ORDERED that NYSE's motion for summary judgment that all asserted claims of the 002 Patent are invalid is GRANTED; ORDERED that NYSE's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the 877and 002 Patents is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Papyrus's motion for summary judgment of infringement of the 002 Patent is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Judith M. Barzilay on 9/2/2009) (rw) Modified on 9/2/2009 (rw).
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 151 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, that for the foregoing reasons, the court will allow the Declaration to be admitted to the record in this case. Further, the court will allow NYSE the opportunity to (a) depose Hollaar about the First Supplemental Report, the Second Supplemental Report, and the Declaration; and (b) submit supplemental rebuttal reports, on issues arising out of the re-deposition, from its experts Dr. David J. Goodman and Dr. Maureen O'Hara.. (Signed by Judge Judith M. Barzilay on 4/7/09) (cd)
April 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER/SCOPE AND LIMITS OF APPOINTMENT AS A TECHNICAL ADVISOR, Dr. Clifford Stein's appointment as a Technical Advisor in this case is subject to the following terms: Dr. Stein will examine the patents in this suit, the pertinent briefs, and any evidence submitted with an eye towards helping the court in understanding the technology involved in the patents from the point of view of one skilled in the art, and as further set forth in this document. (Signed by Judge Judith M. Barzilay on 4/6/09) (cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Papyrus Technology Corporation v. New York Stock Exchange LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?