Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez et al
1:2004cv02235 |
March 19, 2004 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 OPINION: For the reasons stated above, plaintiffs motion for pre-judgment interest is denied. Plaintiffs motion for post-verdict interest is granted. Plaintiffs motion for costs is denied without prejudice to renew his application in conformity with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and Local Civil Rule 54.1(a). Parties to submit judgment on notice. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 6/11/2010) (jpo) |
Filing 72 OPINION: Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law as to the punitive damages award is granted, and the punitive damages awards against Shaiman and CAI are vacated. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/14/2010) (jfe) |
Filing 58 OPINION #97425: that plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law on the tortious interference claims is denied. The motion for a new trial on this issue is granted re: 50 FIRST MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, FIRST MOTION for New Trial, filed by William F. Raedle. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/15/09) (cd) Modified on 4/20/2009 (mro). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.