Pacenza v. IBM Corporation
Plaintiff: James C. Pacenza, SR.
Defendant: IBM Corporation
Case Number: 1:2004cv05831
Filed: July 27, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: Paul G. Gardephe
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, IBM's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Pacenza's motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions [Docket No. 17] and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 4/1/2009) (jfe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pacenza v. IBM Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James C. Pacenza, SR.
Represented By: Michael David Diederich, Jr.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IBM Corporation
Represented By: Kevin G. Lauri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?