Sotheby's, Inc. v. Shene et al
| 1:2004cv10067 |
| December 20, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Thomas P. Griesa |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER that in light of the court's opinion holding that Baden-Wurttemberg is the legal owner of the book, the court vacates its order of 3/8/06. However, by consent of Baden-Wurttemberg and Sotheby's, the court now orders the following. Sot heby's shall retain possession of the Augsburger Geschlechterbuch, as custodian for Baden-Wurttemberg, in Sotheby's Manhattan premises, until the later of the date from which no appeal may be taken from the Judgment in this case, or the resolution of any such appeal, and as further set forth in this document. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/9/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
80
OPINION:# 97275 Baden-Wurttemberg's motion for summary judgment is granted in all respects. Shene's motion for summary judgment is denied in all respects. The parties are directed to submit a proposed judgment to the court. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/23/09) (js) Modified on 3/25/2009 (jab).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sotheby's, Inc. v. Shene et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
