Varela v. Demmon et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv06079
Filed: June 30, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Gabriel W. Gorenstein
Presiding Judge: Sidney H. Stein
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER: the Court has nonetheless conducted de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and adopts it in its entirety. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in that Report, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, with respect to plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim only, summary judgment is granted for defendants Hahn, Riccione, Mrzyglod, Wahlquist, and LaPier, and denied for defendant Demmon. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 7/17/2009) (tve)
June 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 109 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS For the foregoing reasons, defendants motion for partial summary judgment (Docket # 97) should be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the First Amendment retaliation claims related to Officers Hahn, Riccione, Mrzyglod, and Wahlquist and Sergeant LaPier should be dismissed. The First Amendment retaliation claim against Officer Demmon remains. Objections to R&R due by 7/9/2009 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 6/19/2009) (jmi)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Varela v. Demmon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?