Pasqualini v. Mortgageit, Inc.
| Corrine B. Pasqualini |
| Mortgageit, Inc., Cheryl Cohen, Mark Pappas and Richard Schulman |
| 1:2005cv09714 |
| August 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| Lisa Margaret Smith |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
OPINION AND ORDER:#97878 For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. #56) is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted with respect to the following claims, all of which are dismissed with prej udice and without costs or attorneys' fees: Count II: creation of a hostile work environment in violation of the New York Human Rights Law ("NYHRL"), with respect to defendants Mark Pappas and Cheryl Cohen only; Count III: quid pro quo sexual harassment in violation of Title VII against MortgageIT; Count IV: quid pro quo sexual harassment in violation of the NYHRL against MortgageIT, Richard Schulman, Pappas and Cohen; Count IX: intentional infliction of emotional distress against Schulman; Count XII: retaliatory termination and defamation through conspiracy against MortgageIT, Pappas, Schulman, Cohen and Patricia Gorman; Count XIII: intentional interference with prospective economic advantage against MortgageIT, Pappas and C ohen; Count XIV: defamation per se against MortgageIT, Pappas, Schulman and Cohen; Count XV: slander per se against MortgageIT, Schulman, Pappas and Cohen; Count XVI: libel per se against MortgageIT; Count XVII: battery against Schulman; and Count XV III: assault against Schulman. All claims against defendant Gorman are dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees. Summary judgment is denied with respect to the following claims: Count I: creation of a hostile work environmen t in violation of Title VII against MortgageIT; Count II: creation of a hostile work environment in violation of NYHRL against MortgageIT and Schulman; and Count V: retaliation in violation of Title VII against MortgageIT. Defendants have not moved f or summary judgment with respect to Count XI: wrongful termination in violation of the NYHRL against MortgageIT, Pappas and Cohen, and, therefore, that claim remains.Plaintiffs motion for sanctions (Doc. #67) is denied. Counsel shall confer as to the steps required to resolve the matter and shall appear, by telephone if they so desire, for a conference on August 10 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 12A at 500 Pearl Street. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/3/2009) (jpo) Modified on 8/13/2009 (jab).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
