Jews for Jesus v. Google, Inc.
Plaintiff Jews for Jesus sued defendant Google, Inc. for creating a jewsforjesus third-level sub-domain within its blogspot.com domain. Plaintiff alleges the the Google-hosted Jews for Jesus blog authored by an anonymous third-party violated plaintiff's rights to the Jews for Jesus trademark.
| Jews for Jesus |
| Google, Inc. |
| 1:2005cv10684 |
| December 21, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John E. Sprizzo |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (Signed by Judge John E. Sprizzo on 7/21/2006) (jmi, )
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material.... (Signed by Judge Peter K. Leisure on 6/1/06) (cd, )
|
|
Filing
13
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Jeffrey A. Conciatori on behalf of Google, Inc.. New Address: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd. Fl, New York, New York, United States 10010, 212-849-7000. (Conciatori, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER; plaintiff is granted leave to submit its motion to strike, not to exceed tewenty-five pages on or before April 10, 2006. The Court will review such motion and advise whether a response and oral argument are necessary; all discovery in the captioned action shall be completed on or before July 7, 2006; a pre-trial conference shall occur on July 11, 2006 at 3:00 p.m.....; (Signed by Judge John E. Sprizzo on 3/10/06) (djc, )
|
|
Filing
9
ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Google, Inc..(Conciatori, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION AND ORDER the time for defendant Google, Inc. to respond to the complaint is extended to 2/7/06. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge John E. Sprizzo on 1/17/06) (jco, )
|
|
Filing
5
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John E. Sprizzo. Judge Richard M. Berman no longer assigned to the case. (kco, )
|
|
Filing
4
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Paul Matthew Fakler on behalf of Jews for Jesus (Fakler, Paul)
|
|
Filing
3
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Google, Inc. served on 12/27/2005, answer due 1/16/2006. Service was accepted by Corporation Service Company. Document filed by Jews for Jesus. (Winick, Paul)
|
|
Filing
2
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by Jews for Jesus.(es, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 12/28/2005 (mbe, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jews for Jesus v. Google, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jews for Jesus | |
| Represented By: | Paul A. Winick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Google, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Conciatori |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
