SS&C Technologies, Inc. v. Reuters America L.L.C. et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: SS&C Technologies, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Reuters America, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2006cv00154
Filed: January 10, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Naomi Reice Buchwald
Presiding Judge: Kevin Nathaniel Fox
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: All claims asserted by the plaintiff-counterclaim defendant against defendants-counterclaim plaintiffs Reuters America LLC and Reuters Limited are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party as against any other party. All claims asserted by the defendants-counterclaim plaintiffs against plaintiff-counterclaim defendant SS&C Technologies, Inc. are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party as against any other party. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 7/20/2006) (lb, )
June 23, 2006 Filing 13 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi R. Buchwald from Charles Spada dated 6/14/06 re: counsel requests that the court allow the parties an additional eight days to complete document discovery. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 6/22/06) (dle, )
May 16, 2006 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox : Settlement Conference held on 5/16/2006. (jco, )
May 15, 2006 Filing 12 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi R. Buchwald from Charles T. Spada dated 5/10/06 re: granting requests for leave to serve documents request be extended to 5/19/06. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 5/12/06) (pl, )
April 26, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 5/10/2006 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox in Courtroom 519, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 4/26/2006) (lb, )
April 3, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Settlement. Referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/3/06) (js, )
April 3, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER; All Motions to compel fact discovery due by 7/27/2006. All Discovery due by 8/28/2006. Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/18/2006. Additional discovery deadlines are as set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/3/06) (pl, )
March 14, 2006 Filing 8 REPLY re: 6 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendants. Document filed by SS&C Technologies, Inc., SS&C Technologies, Inc.. (Greenberg, Ira)
March 3, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE SCHEDULING AND INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 3/31/2006 03:00 PM before Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, in courtroom 21A, 500 Pearl Street. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/2/06) (jco, )
March 1, 2006 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND., COUNTERCLAIM against SS&C Technologies, Inc.. Document filed by Reuters America L.L.C., Reuters Limited, Reuters America, Inc..(Spada, Charles)
March 1, 2006 Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by Reuters America L.L.C., Reuters Limited.(Spada, Charles)
February 1, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER: the time for defendants Reuters America LLC and Reuters Limited to respond to the complaint is extended to 3/1/06. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/18/06) (db, )
February 1, 2006 Set Answer Due Date purs. to 4 Stipulation and Order as to Reuters America L.L.C. answer due on 3/1/2006; Reuters Limited answer due on 3/1/2006. (db, )
February 1, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL; that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), this action is dismissed as against dft. Reuters America, Inc. without costs. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/1/06) (pl, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 2/23/2006 (ml, ).
January 10, 2006 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by SS&C Technologies, Inc..(jp, )
January 10, 2006 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reuters America L.L.C., Reuters Limited, Reuters America, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 250.00, Receipt Number 565903)Document filed by SS&C Technologies, Inc..(laq, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 1/17/2006 (mbe, ).
January 10, 2006 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Reuters America L.L.C., Reuters Limited, Reuters America, Inc.. (laq, )
January 10, 2006 Case Designated ECF. (laq, )
January 10, 2006 Magistrate Judge Kevin N. Fox is so designated. (laq, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SS&C Technologies, Inc. v. Reuters America L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SS&C Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Ira George Greenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Reuters America, Inc.
Represented By: Charles T. Spada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?