Hunt et al v. Enzo Biochem, Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv00170
Filed: January 10, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Shira A. Scheindlin
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 173 ORDER re: (116 in 1:06-cv-00213-PKC, 165 in 1:06-cv-00170-PKC, 81 in 1:06-cv-06347-PKC) Letter, filed by Lawrence A. McMahon, Lawrence F. Glaser: Accordingly, the Court's order only addresses sealed documents in these actions. The Court order s the Clerk to unseal Doc. 7 in 06-cv-6347. The Clerk shall terminate the letter motions. (06-cv-170, Doc. 165; 06-cv-213, Doc. 116; 06-cv-6347, Doc. 81). (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 12/3/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00170-PKC, 1:06-cv-00213-PKC, 1:06-cv-06347-PKC (jwh) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing.
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER: The Orders of September 16, 2020 in Nos. 06-cv-170 (Doc. 166), 06-cv-213 (Doc. 117), and 06-cv-6347 (Doc. 82) are VACATED. Enzo Biochem may respond in 14 days. Movant may reply 7 days thereafter. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/18/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00170-PKC, 1:06-cv-00213-PKC, 1:06-cv-06347-PKC (rro)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ORDER: In 06-cv-170 (PKC), there were only two sealed documents: Doc. 43 and Doc. 139. Doc. 43 was filed on January 11, 2007 and was destroyed on March 4, 2015 because it was not retrieved by the party who filed it 30 days after notice. Doc. 139, fil ed August 9, 2011, was retrieved by the party who sought sealing on May 4, 2015. In 06-cv-213 (PKC), there were no sealed documents. In 06-cv-6347 (PKC), there was one seal document, Doc. 7 filed January 8, 2007. Mr. Glazer filed his request to unsea l on August 18, 2020 and no response or objection has ben received. The Court orders the Clerk to unseal Doc. 7 in 06-cv-6347. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/16/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00170-PKC, 1:06-cv-00213-PKC, 1:06-cv-06347-PKC (ama) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing. Modified on 9/17/2020 (ama).
October 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 157 OPINION AND ORDER: Brecher's motion is granted in part and denied in part. Glaser is hereby enjoined from further disseminating all confidential documents obtained from Brecher and all materials derived therefrom. Glaser shall forthwith return any such documents and copies still in his possession or control to Enzo. Brecher's motion for damages is denied. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/22/2012) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00170-SAS, 1:06-cv-00213-SAS, 1:06-cv-06347-SAS(ft)
October 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 144 OPINION AND ORDER: Brecher and Lewicki each violated the Protective Order, leading to Glasers misuse of confidential information in his Rule 60(b) motion in the Virginia case. It is therefore ORDERED that: Pursuant to this Courts power under Rule 37( b)(2) to enforce its orders issued under Rule 26(c), Brecher is HEREBY HELD IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT for noncompliance with the Protective Order; Pursuant to this Court's power under Rule 37(b)(2) to enforce its orders issued under Rule 26(c), Lewicki is HEREBY HELD IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT for noncompliance with the Protective Order. In order to purge his contempt, Brecher is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $33,780.86 to the Enzo Defendants, and to take all necessary steps to retrieve from Glaser any documents designated "Confidential," whether originals or copies, previously produced by the Enzo Defendants; In order to purge his contempt, Lewicki is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $33,780.86 to the Enzo Defendants, and to take al l necessary steps to retrieve from Glaser any documents designated "Confidential," whether originals or copies, previously produced by the Enzo Defendants. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/11/2011) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00170-SAS, 1:06-cv-00213-SAS, 1:06-cv-06347-SAS(ft)
June 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 121 OPINION and ORDER re:#97629 For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motions for summary judgment granted. (83 in 1:06-cv-00213-SAS, 103 in 1:06-cv-00170-SAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Barry Weiner, Enzo Biochem, Inc., (49 in 1:06-cv- 06347-SAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Barry Weiner, Enzo Biochem, Inc., (44 in 1:06-cv-06347-SAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Heiman Gross, (98 in 1:06-cv-00170-SAS, 78 in 1:06-cv-00213-SAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Heiman Gross.The Clerk of the Court is also directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 6/15/09) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00170-SAS, 1:06-cv-00213-SAS, 1:06-cv-06347-SAS(djc) Modified on 6/17/2009 (jab).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunt et al v. Enzo Biochem, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?