Reiseck v. Universal Communications of Miami, Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv00777
Filed: February 1, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Thomas P. Griesa
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 173 ORDER & OPINION: For the reasons stated herein, the Settlement Report and the Damages Report are both ADOPTED in their entirety. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Universal, Blue Horizon and Ruderman, jointly and seve rally, for the total amount of $284,078.86 as set out in the Damages Report. By a concurrently published order, the settlement agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant Gollan is approved. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to pro se Defendant Ruderman and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/22/2014) (kgo)
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 152 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting 135 MOTION for Default Judgment as to filed by Lynore Reiseck. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion as follows: judgment by default is entered against Defendants Ruderman, Universal and Blue Horizon. The inquest on damages, attorneys' fees and costs is referred to Magistrate Judge Francis. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 135. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/19/2014) (ft)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 OPINION: that for the foregoing reasons, the motions of defendants Bernstein and Lurie are granted. The motion of defendants Blue Horizon and Ruderman are denied. Defendant Gollan's motion is also denied. This opinion resolves docket items numbers 12, 56, 66, and 7l. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 8/23/2012) (pl)
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION the Court has considered the parties' submissions and holds that summary judgment is not appropriate for either side with regard to the outside salesperson exemption...The Clerk of the Court is directed to reopen this case. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 5/18/11) (cd)
March 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION:#97303 Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and the case is dismissed. Plaintiff's cross-motion for partial summary judgment is denied. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/25/09) (js) Modified on 3/30/2009 (jab).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reiseck v. Universal Communications of Miami, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?