Securities and Exchange Commission v. Espuelas et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv02435
Filed: March 29, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Holwell
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 209 OPINION & ORDER: Morales's motion for summary judgment is denied. Morales's motion to suppress Regan's testimony is also denied, without prejudice to re-filing closer to trial. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pe nding at docket numbers 158 and 161. A pretrial conference is scheduled for December 13,2012, at 4 p.m., at which the Court will set, inter alia, a deadline for the filing of pretrial submissions, and a trial date. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/26/2012) (ft)
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 129 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, defendant Morales' motion 116 is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 2/25/2011) (rjm)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 101 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Betsy D. Scolnik. For the reasons further set forth in this Opinion and Order, Scolnik's motion for summary jUdgment 75 is granted as to the Section 17(a), Section l0(b), and Rule l0b-5 claims. It is denied as to the Rule 13b2-1 claim. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 3/29/2010) (tve)
March 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 69 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Adriana J. Kampfner, Betsy D. Scolnik, Fernando J. Espuelas, Jack C. Chen. For the reasons stated above, defendants' motion 69 is denied as to all claims ag ainst Chen and Espuelas, all claims against Kampfiler, and the aiding and abetting claims against Scolnik. It is granted as to the Section 17(a), Section l0(b), and Rule l0b-5 claims against Scolnik for her involvement in the incremental revenue transactions.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 3/26/2010) (tve)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Espuelas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?