Infosint S.A., v. H. Lundbeck A/S et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv02869
Filed: April 12, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Ronald L. Ellis
Presiding Judge: Lewis A. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 213 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Denying 191 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law. filed by Infosint S.A.; Denied as moot 180 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law that the Ramdev Process Does Not Infringe filed by Forest Laboratories, Inc., H. Lundbeck A/S, Lundbeck, Inc., Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Granting 186 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law that U.S. Patent No. 6,458,973 is Invalid as Obvious filed by Forest Laboratories, Inc., H. Lundbeck A/S, Lundbeck, Inc., Forest Pharmaceuticals , Inc., Denied as moot 183 MOTION for Reconsideration of any Judgment on Their Equitable Defenses and Counterclaim. filed by Forest Laboratories, Inc., H. Lundbeck A/S, Lundbeck, Inc., Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Denying 189 MOTION to Alter Judgment re: 177 Judgment. filed by Infosint S.A. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/17/10) (djc)
August 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER: Defendant's motion [docket item 135] is denied in all respects. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/12/2009) (jpo)
June 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 134 MEMORANDUM OPINION: #97683 that defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (docket item 76) is denied. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/26/09) (cd) Modified on 6/29/2009 (jab).
May 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 132 OPINION:#97565 For the foregoing reasons, defendants motion for partial summary judgment [docket item 75] is granted to the extent that the Court concludes that claims 1 and 21 of the 973 patent are invalid, and dismisses so much of the amended compl aint as alleges infringement of claim 1 of the 973 patent and all claims dependent thereon. It is denied in all other respects. As the Court has concluded also that claim 1 of the 813 patent is invalid, Count II of defendants counterclaim is dismissed. The Court will hold a status conference on June 17 at 4:00pm. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 5/28/2009) (jfe) Modified on 5/29/2009 (jab).
May 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MEMORANDUM OPINION #97487: Forest's motion for partial summary judgment [docket item 77] is denied. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 5/5/09) (tro) Modified on 5/6/2009 (mro).
March 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 124 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION:#97294 For the foregoing reasons, defendants' objections to R & R are overruled. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ellis's recommendation. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/27/2009) (jpo) Modified on 3/30/2009 (jab).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Infosint S.A., v. H. Lundbeck A/S et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?