Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd. v. Sunbeam Products, Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv03522
Filed: May 9, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Holwell
Presiding Judge: Henry B. Pitman
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:#98115 For the reasons stated above, defendants motions for summary judgment 66 are granted. Simatelexs motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction 65 is denied as moot. Sunbeams counterclaim for declaratory j udgment of the invalidity of the 585 patent, which Sunbeam does not mention in its motion papers, is dismissed without prejudice. See Liquid Dynamics v. Vaughan Co., 355 F.3d 1361, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2004). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close th is case. 65 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [RENEWED] and For a Summary Judgment and a Partial Summary Judgment filed by Simatelex Manufactory Co., Ltd., 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Defendant Sunbeam Products, Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment and Partial Summary Judgment) filed by Sunbeam Products, Inc. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 9/30/09) (db) Modified on 10/2/2009 (jab).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd. v. Sunbeam Products, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?