Cunningham et al v. Electronic Data Systmes Corp. et al
1:2006cv03530 |
May 10, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Richard J. Holwell |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 172 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS in part plaintiffs motion to certify [06cv3530 Docket No. 140, 08cv10409 Docket No. 87] this action as a collective action. The parties are directed to confer about the form an d content of the notice that will be sent to potential opt-in plaintiffs. A joint proposed notice shall be submitted to this Court within three weeks of this opinion. If the parties cannot agree on a form of notice, they shall submit letter memoranda by that date. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 12/13/2010) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-03530-RJH, 1:08-cv-10409-RJH(jpo) |
Filing 129 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Electronic Data Systems Corp. For the reasons stated, defendant's motion for summary judgment 60 is denied. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 3/30/2010) (tro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cunningham et al v. Electronic Data Systmes Corp. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.