Lindner v. American Express Corporation et al
| 1:2006cv03834 |
| May 19, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Theodore H. Katz |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
255
OPINION: Under these circumstances, plaintiff must be held responsible for entering into the settlement agreement that ended the case. Plaintiffs motion is denied. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 12/23/2010) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
199
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, #98449 that the Court has received the attached Motion for Proposed Appearance" in which the plaintiff seeks to represent himself pro se in this case concerning efforts he seeks to pursue relating to his purported d esire to be nominated to the American Express Board of Directors and to pursue a Shareholder Proposal. He seeks to continue with his counsel for other matters in this case but to represent himself solely with respect to the above cited issues. Becau se the plaintiff is represented by counsel in this case, the plaintiff's application to represent himself for certain issues is denied. It should also be noted that this litigation is about events that occurred some years ago. It is not a vehicl e to raise new claims or issues that the plaintiff may have with American Express. If he wishes to raise those issues, the proper vehicle is a new lawsuit which does not appear to be related to the issues in this case. The Court expresses noopinion on any such new lawsuit. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/8/10) (pl) Modified on 1/14/2010 (ajc).
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER, by no later than 5/29/09, Plaintiff shall submit a brief letter to the Court, not exceeding two double-spaced pages, setting forth the nature of the emotional distress damages Plaintiff is contending he suffered, and for which he is seeking damages in this action, as a result of Defendants' alleged breach of the settlement agreement and alleged retaliation. ( Status Report due by 5/29/2009.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 5/22/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #96949: For the reasons set forth in this order, Plaintiffs motion for sanctions is denied. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 1/8/09) (mme) Modified on 1/15/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lindner v. American Express Corporation et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
