Lazare Kaplan International Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2006cv04005
Filed: May 25, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Thomas P. Griesa
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 433 OPINION. The Court grants defendants' motion for relief from the prior judgment that claims 1 and 7 of the '351 patent were valid. The Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment of invalidity of claims 1 and 7 of the '351 patent. The Court denies as moot plaintiff's motion for summary judgment of infringement. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/15/2012) (rjm)
May 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 349 OPINION:# 97524 LKI's motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial are denied. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 5/15/09) (tro) Modified on 5/19/2009 (jab).
February 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 197 OPINION AND ORDER #95678 re: 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Photoscribe Technologies, Inc., David Benderly. The court rules that defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the direct infringement claim with respect to patent n o. 6,476,351. The ruling of the court at the Markman hearing actually permits dismissal only of the claim of direct infringement. Determining whether the '351 patent was infringed under the doctrine of equivalents requires determination of dispu ted issues of fact in connection with the patent prosecution record, and summary judgment should be not be granted with respect to that issue. The remaining issues that are the subject of the parties' motions also require determination of disputed factual issues, and cannot be disposed of on the current record. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/5/08) (jco) Modified on 2/6/2008 (ae).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lazare Kaplan International Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?