Xerox Corporation v. Media Sciences International, Inc. et al
| 1:2006cv04872 |
| June 23, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 183 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #98697 The Court construes the disputed claim terms as set forth in this order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 3/17/2010) (jmi) Modified on 3/22/2010 (eef).
|
|
Filing
168
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:#98114 MSI has failed to set out specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial as to Xerox's monopoly power. Accordingly, Xerox's motion for summary judgment on MSI's monopolization counterclaims 101 i s granted. The Court did not consider evidence related to Xerox's loyalty rebate programs in its disposition of this motion, thus this decision and order should not be interpreted as superseding or modifying the Court's March 30, 2009, decision and order in Xerox II. 101 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Defendant's Monopolization Counterclaims filed by Xerox Corporation. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 9/30/09) (db) Modified on 10/2/2009 (jab).
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER denying 135 Motion for TRO; denying 135 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 156 Motion to Strike ; granting nunc pro tunc 158 Motion to Seal; granting nunc pro tunc 161 Motion to Seal. The preliminary injunction hearing schedlued for 4/17/09, at 3:00 pm should be removed from the Court's calendar. Defendant may renew its motion at any time by letter to the Court. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 4/9/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
166
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #97318: For the reasons further set forth in said Order, Xerox's 99 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its First Affirmative Defense is GRANTED. While Xerox requested in its Amended Reply and Affirmative Defens e that the Court dismiss with prejudice Media Sciences's antitrust counterclaims to the extent that they challenge Xerox's loyalty rebate program, considering the plain language of Para. 18 and 25 of the Settlement Agreement and the policy favoring the availability of a judicial forum for antitrust claims, the motion is GRANTED without prejudice. 99 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on its First Affirmative Defense Concerning Media Sciences' Antitrust Counterclaim filed by Xerox Corporation. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 3/30/09) (db) Modified on 3/31/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Xerox Corporation v. Media Sciences International, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
