Miller v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv05087
Filed: June 30, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: John F. Keenan
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION & ORDER # 98171. For the foregoing reasons Merck's motion to dismiss the complaint is granted subject to the following conditions: 1) Defendants consent to jurisdiction and acceptance of process in any suit plaintiff Miller files in the appropriate United Kingdom court on the claims that are the subject of the instant suit. 2) Defendants agree to waive any statute of limitations defense acquired after the action was filed in this Court. 3) Defendants agree to produce at trial any wi tness under their employ located beyond the subpoena power of the British court, provided that the British court finds the witness necessary for plaintiff's case. 4) Defendants will advise the Court of their consent to these conditions within thirty days of this Order. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 10/21/09) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-md-01789-JFK-JCF, 1:06-cv-05087-JFK(rjm) Modified on 10/23/2009 (eef).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?