Graves v. Merck & Co., Inc.
| 1:2006cv05513 |
| July 21, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| John F. Keenan |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER, Plaintiff's objection to Defendant's slide 12, the "Dr. Adams Slide," is sustained. Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's slides 11 and 100 are dismissed as moot, as Merck will not be pr esenting these slides during opening statements. Plaintiff's objection to slide 113 is sustained. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slide 5 is overruled as to bullet points one through three, and sustained as to bullet point four. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slides 6-9 is overruled. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slide 15 is overruled. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slide 61 is sustained. Defendant's objection to Plaintif f's slide 27 is sustained. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slide 28 is sustained as to bullet points one, three, and four, and overruled as to bullet point 2. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slide 29 is sustained a s to bullet points one and three, and overruled as to bullet point two. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slide 50 is overruled as to bullet points one, two, three, five, and six, and sustained as to bullet point four. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slide 83 is sustained. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's slides 109 and 110 is sustained. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 10/29/2010) (lnl)
|
|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: At oral argument on October 20, 2010, the Court addressed nine motions in limine made by the Plaintiff, Mrs. Judith Graves ("Graves"), and twenty-nine motions in limine made by the Defendant, Merck & Co., Inc. ("Merck"). After arguments were heard, the Court issued oral rulings on thirty-two of the motions, but reserved decision on six of the motions. The Court will address each of these motions below, in turn. This evidence is not relevant to establishing liability for Graves' alleged injures, and therefore, Merck's motions in limine #9 and #11 are GRANTED. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 10/27/2010) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-md-01789-JFK -JCF, 1:06-cv-05513-JFK(jfe)
|
|
Filing
101
OPINION AND ORDER: As discussed above, there are genuine and material issues of fact in this case, and therefore Merck's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Additionally, for the reasons described above, Merck's motion to exclude unquali fied expert testimony under Daubert GRANTED with respect to Drs. Adams, Akers, and Marx, and is DENIED with respect to Drs. Villaret and Cherry. So Ordered (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 10/22/2010) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:06-md-01789-JFK -JCF, 1:06-cv-05513-JFK(js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Graves v. Merck & Co., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
