Goga v. Zim American Integrated Shipping Services Company Inc. et al
1:2006cv05783 |
July 31, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Lewis A. Kaplan |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 ORDER: The Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate JudgeGorenstein, dated April 30, 2009, to which no objection has been filed. The Clerk shall enter final judgment as described therein and close the case. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 5/20/2009) (jfe) |
Filing 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS a final judgment should be entered as follows: (1) all claims against Seaspeed are dismissed with prejudice; (2) all claims against Global are dismissed with prejudice; (3) judgment is entered against Zim in the amount of & #036;500 in accordance with the Order filed September 18, 2008 (Docket # 51), provided that Zim retains the right to contest its liability in the event that the $500 limitation is vacated on remand following appeal Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2009 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 4/30/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers (jmi) Modified on 5/7/2009 (jmi). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Goga v. Zim American Integrated Shipping Services Company Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.