Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Safenet, Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Safenet, Inc. et al

Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Safenet, Inc. et al

Case Number:	1:2006cv05797
Filed:	August 1, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge:	Paul A. Crotty
Nature of Suit:	Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 12, 2010	Filing 112 OPINION AND ORDER: #98672 Accordingly, under Steinhardt's case specific selective waiver test, Plaintiffs' request to compel production of the Privileged Materials is DENIED. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 3/11/2010) (jmi) Modified on 3/18/2010 (ajc).
August 5, 2009	Filing 89 OPINION & ORDER:#97847 CONCLUSION: To summarize the Court's holdings as to each defendant: SafeNet's motion to dismiss Counts One, Six, Seven, and Eight is DENIED, and its motion to dismiss Counts Three and Five is GRANTED. The Compensatio n Committee Defendants' (Brooks, Hunt, Thaw, and Money) motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, Five, Six, Seven, and Nine is GRANTED. The Compensation Committee Defendants are dismissed from the case. Directors Harrison and Clarks motion to dismis s Counts Five, Six, Seven, and Nine is GRANTED. Harrison and Clark are dismissed from the case. Caputos motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, Six, Seven, Eight, and Nine is DENIED, and his motion to dismiss Counts Three and Four is GRANTED. Argos moti on to dismiss Counts One, Two, Six, Seven, Eight, and Nine is DENIED, and her motion to dismiss Counts Three and Four is GRANTED. Muellers motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, Three, and Four is GRANTED. Mueller is dismissed from this case. The Cler k of the Court is directed to close out the motions on the docket numbered 55, 59, 63, 66, and 68. The remaining parties should appear for a scheduling conference in this case at 3:30 p.m. on September 15, 2009, in courtroom 20C. Prior to the conference the parties should meet and confer, and then prepare and submit for Court approval a Civil Case Management Plan. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on August 5, 2009) (mov) Modified on 8/7/2009 (jab).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 12, 2010

Filing 112 OPINION AND ORDER: #98672 Accordingly, under Steinhardt's case specific selective waiver test, Plaintiffs' request to compel production of the Privileged Materials is DENIED. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 3/11/2010) (jmi) Modified on 3/18/2010 (ajc).

August 5, 2009

Filing 89 OPINION & ORDER:#97847 CONCLUSION: To summarize the Court's holdings as to each defendant: SafeNet's motion to dismiss Counts One, Six, Seven, and Eight is DENIED, and its motion to dismiss Counts Three and Five is GRANTED. The Compensatio n Committee Defendants' (Brooks, Hunt, Thaw, and Money) motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, Five, Six, Seven, and Nine is GRANTED. The Compensation Committee Defendants are dismissed from the case. Directors Harrison and Clarks motion to dismis s Counts Five, Six, Seven, and Nine is GRANTED. Harrison and Clark are dismissed from the case. Caputos motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, Six, Seven, Eight, and Nine is DENIED, and his motion to dismiss Counts Three and Four is GRANTED. Argos moti on to dismiss Counts One, Two, Six, Seven, Eight, and Nine is DENIED, and her motion to dismiss Counts Three and Four is GRANTED. Muellers motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, Three, and Four is GRANTED. Mueller is dismissed from this case. The Cler k of the Court is directed to close out the motions on the docket numbered 55, 59, 63, 66, and 68. The remaining parties should appear for a scheduling conference in this case at 3:30 p.m. on September 15, 2009, in courtroom 20C. Prior to the conference the parties should meet and confer, and then prepare and submit for Court approval a Civil Case Management Plan. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on August 5, 2009) (mov) Modified on 8/7/2009 (jab).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Safenet, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?