Douglas v. The City of New York et al
1:2006cv06134 |
August 14, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Denny Chin |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 OPINION #97034: To summarize the Court's holdings: (1) Defendants' motion is denied as to the false arrest claim; (2) Defendants' motion is denied as to the false arrest claim on the basis of qualified immunity; (3) Defendants' mo tion is granted as to the malicious prosecution claim; (4) Defendants' motion is granted as to the malicious abuse of process claim; (5) On the unlawful search claim, Detectives Rivera and Figueroa's motions for summary judgment are granted , and the motions by Detectives Marrero and Clark are denied; (6) Defendants' motion is denied as to the fair trial claim; and(7) Defendants' motion is denied as to the Monell claim. The parties are ordered to appear in Courtroom 11A on March 13, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. for a pretrial conference. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 2/5/09) (js) Modified on 2/5/2009 (mro). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Douglas v. The City of New York et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.