Douglas v. The City of New York et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv06134
Filed: August 14, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Denny Chin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION #97034: To summarize the Court's holdings: (1) Defendants' motion is denied as to the false arrest claim; (2) Defendants' motion is denied as to the false arrest claim on the basis of qualified immunity; (3) Defendants' mo tion is granted as to the malicious prosecution claim; (4) Defendants' motion is granted as to the malicious abuse of process claim; (5) On the unlawful search claim, Detectives Rivera and Figueroa's motions for summary judgment are granted , and the motions by Detectives Marrero and Clark are denied; (6) Defendants' motion is denied as to the fair trial claim; and(7) Defendants' motion is denied as to the Monell claim. The parties are ordered to appear in Courtroom 11A on March 13, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. for a pretrial conference. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 2/5/09) (js) Modified on 2/5/2009 (mro).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douglas v. The City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?