RFMAS, Inc. v. So et al
| 1:2006cv13114 |
| November 13, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Victor Marrero |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
ORDER, Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/21/2009, and see document for other deadlines as further set forth. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger on 11/18/09) Copies sent by chambers.(cd)
|
|
Filing
143
AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER re: 97 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice filed by RFMAS, Inc., 87 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Mimi So, Mimi So International, Inc., 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, Richemont Holdings I, Richemont SA, Richemont North America, Richemont International, Ltd. The motion (Docket No. 97) of R.F.M.A.S., Inc. ("RFMAS") for summary judgment as to the So Defendants is DENIED in its entirety. The motion (Docket No. 97) of RFMAS for summary jUdgment as to the Richemont Defendants is DENIED in its entirety. The motion (Docket No. 89) of Richemont SA, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, Richemont North America, Richemont Holdings I, and Richemon t International, Ltd. for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. The motion (Docket No. 87) of Mimi So and Mimi So International, Inc. for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 3/31/2009) (tve)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 89 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 97 Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDERED that the motion (Docket No. 97) of R.F.M.A.S., Inc. ("RFMAS") for summary judgment as to the So Defendants is DENIED in its entirety. ORDERED that the motion (Docket No. 97) of RFMAS for summary judgment as to the Richemont Defendants is DENIED in its entirety. ORDERED that the motion (Docket No. 89) of Riche mont SA, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA, Richemont North America, Richemont Holdings I, and Richemont International, Ltd. for summary judgment is DENIED in its entirety. ORDERED that the motion (Docket No. 87) of Mimi So and Mimi So International, Inc. for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 3/30/2009) (tve)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RFMAS, Inc. v. So et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
