International Business Machines Corporation v. Platform Solutions, Incorporated
| International Business Machines Corporation |
| T3 Technologies Inc. |
| International Business Machines Corporation |
| T3 Technologies, Inc |
| T3 Technologies, Inc |
| 1:2006cv13565 |
| September 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
232
MEMORANDUM OPINION:#98130 For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment dismissing T3s complaint [DI 63] is granted. As this terminates the last open claims, the Clerk shall enter final judgment and close the case. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/30/2009) (jfe) Modified on 10/8/2009 (eef).
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER granting 188 Motion to strike defendant T3 Technologies expert rebuttal report of Dr. Edward S. Davidson..... (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/22/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER, the Court will hear oral argument on the cross motions to disqualify counsel as follows. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 190 CROSS MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Quinn Emanuel. 177 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Clement S. Roberts, Joseph C. Gratz, and Durie Tangri Page Lemley Roberts & Kent LLP. ( Motion Hearing set for 6/25/2009 at 04:00 PM before Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/19/09) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
