Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Osberg
Defendant: Foot Locker, Inc. and Foot Locker Retirement Plan
Case Number: 1:2007cv01358
Filed: February 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Deborah A. Batts
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 447 ORDER re: 424 Judgment. Iit is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Court's exercise of jurisdiction over the Foot Locker Retirement Plan, retained pursuant to the Amended Final Judgment in this matter (Dkt. 424 paragraph 7), is hereby extinguished. 2. This Order shall supersede the Court's prior Orders (i) requiring Defendants to submit monthly reports to the Class (Dkt. 424 paragraph 6) and (ii) requiring the Parties to submit quarterly status letters to the Court (Dkt. 436), and such Orders shall no longer have any force or effect. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 9/4/2020) (kv)
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 398 CORRECTION OPINION & ORDER. For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds in favor of the Class on all claims. The appropriate remedy is reformation of the Plan as discussed above. The parties shall submit an appropriate form of order not later than October 13, 2015. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 10/5/2015) (lmb)
September 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 393 OPINION & ORDER. For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds in favor of the Class on all claims. The appropriate remedy is reformation of the Plan as discussed above. The parties shall submit their briefing on prejudgment interest, as well as an appropriate form of order, within two weeks from the date of this Opinion and Order. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 9/29/2015) (lmb)
November 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 220 OPINION & ORDER re: 192 MOTION to Amend/Correct Class Certification Rulings. filed by Geoffrey Osberg. For all of the reasons set forth above, as well as the reasons set forth in this Court's Opinion dated September 24, 2014, the following class is certified: All persons who were participants in the Foot Locker Retirement Plan as of December 31, 1995, who had at least one Hour of Service on or after January 1, 1996 (as defined under the Plan), and who were either paid a b enefit from the Plan after December 31, 1995, or are still entitled to a benefit from the Plan; and the beneficiaries and estates of such persons and alternate payees under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 192. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 11/7/2014) (lmb)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 167 CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER re 126 : For the aforementioned reasons, plaintiff's motion for sanctions is GRANTED. The parties shall confer on the wording of an appropriate adverse inference that the Court shall draw at trial in this matter. T hey shall provide proposals for the scope of such an inference to the Court - jointly if possible, and separately otherwise - within 10 days, or by Thursday, July 24, 2014. The Clerk of Court shall close the motion at ECF No. 126 and remove the Opinion & Order at ECF No. 156 from the docket. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 7/25/2014) (tn)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 156 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 153 MOTION for Sanctions PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF RENEWED MOTION FOR SPOLIATION SANCTIONS. filed by Geoffrey Osberg. For the aforementioned reasons, plaintiffs motion for sanctions isGRANTED.The parties shall confer on the wording of an appropriate instruction to beprovided to the jury at trial in this matter. They shall provide proposals for the wording of such an instruction to the Court-jointly if possible, and separatelyotherwise-within 10 days, or by Thursday, July 24, 2014. The Clerk of Court shall close the motion at ECF No. 126. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 7/14/2014) (js)
September 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED as to Counts One and Two and DENIED as to Counts Three and Four. Defendants shall answer Counts Three and Four of the Complaint within 30 (thirty) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 9/16/2009) (jpo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Osberg
Represented By: Eli Gottesdiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foot Locker, Inc.
Represented By: Howard Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foot Locker Retirement Plan
Represented By: Howard Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?