Capoccia v. Yanez Sanchez
| Donald Capoccia |
| Roberto Yanez Sanchez |
| 1:2007cv03422 |
| April 30, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Contract: Other Office |
| New York |
| Richard J Holwell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: The records of this Court indicate that there has been no activity in this case since the Court denied plaintiffs motion for default judgment on May 22, 2009. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to close this case. See FRCP 41(b). (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 10/9/09) (db)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER that plaintiff's 9/29/08, motion for default judgment is denied. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 5/22/09) (dle)
|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Roberto Yanez Sanchez served on 5/3/2007, answer due 5/23/2007. Service was accepted by Don Dutton, Esq.. Document filed by Donald Capoccia. (Sabharwal, Rohit) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: the Court grants Plaintiff s request to reopen this action. Plaintiff is ordered to submit a new application for default judgment by October 3, 2008. Plaintiffs application must comply with the Default Judgment Procedure set forth in this Court's Individual Practices. A copy of the Default Judgment Procedure is attached to this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 9/17/2008) (tve)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER, that on 4/7/08, the Court contacted Plaintiff's counsel to inquire whether Plaintiff still intended to seek default judgment. Having received no response, the Court hereby dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCP 41(b). The Clerk is instructed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 5/16/08) (cd)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE SCHEDULING AND INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 7/26/2007 10:00 AM before Judge Richard J. Holwell. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 5/18/07) (db)
|
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Donald Capoccia.(mbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roberto Yanez Sanchez. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 613548)Document filed by Donald Capoccia.(mbe) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Roberto Yanez Sanchez. (mbe) |
| Case Designated ECF. (mbe) |
| Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. (mbe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Capoccia v. Yanez Sanchez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald Capoccia | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Richard Lynn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Roberto Yanez Sanchez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
