United States of America ex rel. NPT Associates v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
Plaintiff: United States of America ex rel. NPT Associates
Defendant: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and XYZ Corporations 1-100
Case Number: 1:2007cv05696
Filed: June 14, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Ronald L. Ellis
Presiding Judge: Andrew L. Carter
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 179 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 177 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings against United States of America ex rel. NPT Associates. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 29, 2022, Defendant LabCorp's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 10/5/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 177 OPINION AND ORDER re: 167 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff-Relators Fourth Amended Complaint. filed by Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. For the reasons stated, Defendant LabCorp's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 167, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 167 and close this case. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/29/2022) (ate)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the Parties' submissions regarding Defendant's request for a pre-motion conference for an anticipated motion to dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint. ECF Nos. 161 and 163. Defendant's request for a pre-motion conference is DENIED. Defendant is GRANTED leave to file a motion to dismiss. The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Opening brief due by February 3, 2022. Opposition brief due by March 3, 2022. Reply brief due by March 17, 2022. ( Motions due by 2/3/2022., Responses due by 3/3/2022, Replies due by 3/17/2022.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 1/6/2022) (ate)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's December 13, 2021 letter requesting a pre-motion conference for a motion to dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint. ECF No. 161. To date, Plaintiff-Relator has yet to respond. Plaintiff-Relator is hereby ordered to respond no later than December 28, 2021. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/22/2021) (ate)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 157 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File: Due to the impending 11/10/2021 deadline, as a courtesy, Defendant's Letter Motion (ECF No. 157) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant' ;s deadline for responding to the FAC hereby is extended to 11/24/2021. No later than 11/12/2021, Plaintiff shall show cause why Defendant's time to respond to the FAC should not be extended until 12/12/2021 (i.e., the date requested by Defendant in its letter motion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 11/9/2021) (Aaron, Stewart)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER: Upon consideration of the August 24, 2021 letter (ECF No. 154) submitted by the United States and the June 10, 2020 joint status report (ECF No. 152), it is hereby ORDERED that the Fourth Amended Complaint shall be unsealed and service upon the Defendants is authorized. The status reports submitted under seal by the Plaintiff-Relator after the filing of the Fourth Amended Complaint shall remain under seal. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/20/2021) (ate)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER: The Parties most recent status letter states that the United States Attorney's Office has completed its investigation and indicated to NPT that it was declining to intervene in this matter. To date, the Government has not formally not ified the Court that it was declining to intervening in this matter. The Government shall update the Court on whether it intends to intervene in this matter by August 30, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/16/2021) (rj)
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 150 ORDER. The parties should submit a joint status report by June 10, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/3/2020) (rjm)
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 98 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Defendant LabCorp's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 79) is GRANTED. The Court will hold a status conference in this case on December 2, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. to discuss leave to amend and any other next steps in the proceedings. The parties (and/or counsel) should appear in person in Courtroom 1306 at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY, on the date and time specified above. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/17/2015) (kgo)
November 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' motion seeking discovery on the limited issue of whether NPT may be disqualified as relators because of knowledge potentially obtained via former counsel, Troutman and Michael, is GRANTED. The Parties are HEREBY ORDERED to submit a joint proposed discovery schedule, which includes this issue and the matters already submitted by the Parties. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 11/28/2012) (js)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America ex rel. NPT Associates v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America ex rel. NPT Associates
Represented By: Richard Ackerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Represented By: Toni-Ann Citera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ Corporations 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?