Hamza v. Saks Incorporated et al

Hamza v. Saks Incorporated et al

Plaintiff:	Mona Hamza
Defendant:	Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2007cv05974
Filed:	June 22, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Rockland
Presiding Judge:	Lisa Margaret Smith
Presiding Judge:	Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 5, 2011	Filing 101 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RULING ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE: the defendant's first motion in limine to exclude the testimony of the plaintiff's expert witness (ECF No. 72 ) is DENIED. The defendant's second motion in limine, to strike p laintiff's claim for punitive pay damages, and to limit plaintiff's claim for back pay damages (ECF No. 76 ) is DENIED to the extent that it sought to strike the plaintiff's claim for punitive damages and to limit, as a matter of law the back and front pay damages to which she is entitled before evidence can be presented to the court regarding the same, and is GRANTED to the extent that it sought to limit any testimony and evidence presented regarding back and front pay damages t o presentation to the Court for decision rather than a jury. Finally, this Court DEFERS making a ruling as to specific offerings of evidence and testimony under the defendants third motion in limine, to preclude the introduction of testimony or evide nce concerning claims previously dismissed in this action and testimony from other employees not related to Ramadan 2006 (ECF No. 80 ) until trial, with the exception of evidence regarding the plaintiff's previously dismissed claims of disabili ty discrimination and failure to grant leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, with regard to which the defendant's third motion in limine is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to counsel of record herein. (Signed by Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 12/5/2011) (lnl)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 5, 2011

Filing 101 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RULING ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE: the defendant's first motion in limine to exclude the testimony of the plaintiff's expert witness (ECF No. 72 ) is DENIED. The defendant's second motion in limine, to strike p laintiff's claim for punitive pay damages, and to limit plaintiff's claim for back pay damages (ECF No. 76 ) is DENIED to the extent that it sought to strike the plaintiff's claim for punitive damages and to limit, as a matter of law the back and front pay damages to which she is entitled before evidence can be presented to the court regarding the same, and is GRANTED to the extent that it sought to limit any testimony and evidence presented regarding back and front pay damages t o presentation to the Court for decision rather than a jury. Finally, this Court DEFERS making a ruling as to specific offerings of evidence and testimony under the defendants third motion in limine, to preclude the introduction of testimony or evide nce concerning claims previously dismissed in this action and testimony from other employees not related to Ramadan 2006 (ECF No. 80 ) until trial, with the exception of evidence regarding the plaintiff's previously dismissed claims of disabili ty discrimination and failure to grant leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, with regard to which the defendant's third motion in limine is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to counsel of record herein. (Signed by Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 12/5/2011) (lnl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamza v. Saks Incorporated et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mona Hamza
Represented By:	Brian K Condon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc.
Represented By:	Susan Deegan Friedfel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?